<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>technologically.net &#187; Nikon D300</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologically.net/tag/nikon-d300/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technologically.net</link>
	<description>gear and gadget...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Last but not least: Thom Hogans D300 review</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/last-but-not-least-thom-hogans-d300-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/last-but-not-least-thom-hogans-d300-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thom Hogan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/last-but-not-least-thom-hogans-d300-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thom Hogan has posted his review of the Nikon D300. &#8220;We&#8217;ve seen plenty of examples of aggressive design decisions from Nikon in their eight years of DSLR making, but the D300 is amongst the most aggressive of all&#8221; But read yourself as Thom Hogan is known for his critical views. BTW, his D300 guide will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/last-but-not-least-thom-hogans-d300-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dpreview finally reviews the Nikon D300</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/dpreview-finally-reviews-the-nikon-d300/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/dpreview-finally-reviews-the-nikon-d300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dpreview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/dpreview-finally-reviews-the-nikon-d300/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dpreview finally has posted it&#8217;s long awaited review of the Nikon D300. Here is their strong conclusion: &#8220;Nikon&#8217;s biggest problem now will be bettering the D300; it raises the bar to a new high, and represents the state of the art despite strong competition from the likes of Canon, Sony and Olympus. There&#8217;s simply no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/dpreview-finally-reviews-the-nikon-d300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New D300 firmware A 1.02</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/new-d300-firmware-a-102/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/new-d300-firmware-a-102/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/new-d300-firmware-a-102/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon has released a new firmware A 1.02 for the D300 (downloadable at your Nikon site). Akkording to Nikon it solves a rare problem of vertical stripes if exposure is &#62; 8 seconds.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/new-d300-firmware-a-102/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luminous Landscape and an evaluation of the differences between Canon and Nikon</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/luminous-landscape-and-an-evaluation-of-the-differences-between-canon-and-nikon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/luminous-landscape-and-an-evaluation-of-the-differences-between-canon-and-nikon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 1D MKIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luminous Landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Reichmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/luminous-landscape-and-an-evaluation-of-the-differences-between-canon-and-nikon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Reichmann, owner of the well known Luminous Landscape site, has posted an interesting &#8220;attempt to help Canon users understand what the latest Nikon cameras have to offer, (and visa versa) and how they differ in terms of features, functions and ergonomics&#8221;. Two excerpts: &#8220;After being away from Nikon for the better part of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/luminous-landscape-and-an-evaluation-of-the-differences-between-canon-and-nikon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Kelby: why the D300 is replacing my D2Xs</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/scott-kelby-why-the-d300-is-replacing-my-d2xs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/scott-kelby-why-the-d300-is-replacing-my-d2xs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Kelby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/scott-kelby-why-the-d300-is-replacing-my-d2xs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Kelby, editor and publisher of Photoshop User Magazine, has posted a review of his new Nikon D300 and finally comes to the conclusion&#8230; &#8220;the D300 is a much better, more fully featured update to the D200 than I had ever imagined it would be. How much so? Well, needless to say, I’m selling my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/scott-kelby-why-the-d300-is-replacing-my-d2xs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D300 review by DigitalCameraResource</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-review-by-digitalcameraresource/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-review-by-digitalcameraresource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-review-by-digitalcameraresource/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DigitalCameraResource has their D300 review online: &#8220;It&#8217;s not often that I review a camera actually lives up to the manufacturer&#8217;s hype &#8212; and the D300 does exactly that.&#8221;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-review-by-digitalcameraresource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D300: camera of the year 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-camera-of-the-year-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-camera-of-the-year-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera of the year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-camera-of-the-year-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Editors of Popular Photography &#38; Imaging have choosen the Nikon D300 as the camera of the year 2007. &#8220;No camera both refines and redefines photography as well as the Nikon D300.&#8221;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-camera-of-the-year-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamic range versus ISO: from D100 up to D3</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D2X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a post at the Nikonians there is a comparision between all major Nikon cams: D100, D70, D50, D200, D80, D40x, D2X, D300 and D3, measured based on RAW files  Nikonians submitted. A good and easy way to compare dynamic range, e.g. from the D200 at ISO 200 the D300 is about 1.5 stops better [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason P. Odell comparing D3, D300 and D2X</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D2X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason P. Odell shared his impressions about D3 and D300 and compared it to the D2X: &#8220;I was playing around last night making some test shots in my basement. I compared a series of images with the D3, D300 and D2Xs taken at different ISOs in horrible light (compact fluorescents). I shot in RAW, NR [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First full review of Nikon D300</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/first-full-review-of-nikon-d300/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/first-full-review-of-nikon-d300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/first-full-review-of-nikon-d300/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first full review of the Nikon D300 is online: D300 review by CameraLabs]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/first-full-review-of-nikon-d300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
