<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>technologically.net &#187; comparision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologically.net/tag/comparision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technologically.net</link>
	<description>gear and gadget...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamic range versus ISO: from D100 up to D3</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D2X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a post at the Nikonians there is a comparision between all major Nikon cams: D100, D70, D50, D200, D80, D40x, D2X, D300 and D3, measured based on RAW files  Nikonians submitted. A good and easy way to compare dynamic range, e.g. from the D200 at ISO 200 the D300 is about 1.5 stops better [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/dynamic-range-versus-iso-from-d100-up-to-d3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Harrington: Nikon D3 vs. Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/john-harrington-nikon-d3-vs-canon-eos-1ds-mark-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/john-harrington-nikon-d3-vs-canon-eos-1ds-mark-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 1Ds Mark III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/john-harrington-nikon-d3-vs-canon-eos-1ds-mark-iii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Harrington, who bought both cams at the same time, did a comparision by uprezzing the D3 files to match the 1DsIII resolution &#8211; with interesting results. &#8220;For large commercial jobs, where I am thinking I want a higher native resolution, it&#8217;ll be the Canon I reach for. For low light situations, which are all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/john-harrington-nikon-d3-vs-canon-eos-1ds-mark-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason P. Odell comparing D3, D300 and D2X</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D2X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason P. Odell shared his impressions about D3 and D300 and compared it to the D2X: &#8220;I was playing around last night making some test shots in my basement. I compared a series of images with the D3, D300 and D2Xs taken at different ISOs in horrible light (compact fluorescents). I shot in RAW, NR [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/jason-p-odell-comparing-d3-d300-and-d2x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D3, D300 and 5D studio comparision</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 5D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christian Handl has done a very interesting comparision between Nikon D3 and Canon 5D at lower ISO settings and in the studio with some interesting comments on dynamic range and the ability to boost shadows without noise: &#8220;The propagated fantastic high ISO-performance is actually very good, but for a Canon photographer less of a sensation, with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparision D200/D300 and more D3 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/28/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To bridge the time until D3/D300 are delivered here is a comparision D200/D300 on a Czech site and some more photos made with the D3&#8230; The photographer answers some questions regarding his comparision at the Dpreview forum in this thread.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

