<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>technologically.net &#187; Canon 5D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologically.net/tag/canon-5d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technologically.net</link>
	<description>gear and gadget...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>D300 &#8211; vast improvement or myth?</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-vast-improvement-or-myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-vast-improvement-or-myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 5D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improvment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-vast-improvement-or-myth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until I have read a detailled test made by a reviewer I trust I think the improvement of the D300 on the D200 is about 1 stop. But Ed at Nikon Cafe is claiming a much greater improvement in this thread at Nikon Cafe: &#8220;Been shooting a D300 all morning. There is most definitely, absolutely, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d300/d300-vast-improvement-or-myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D3, D300 and 5D studio comparision</title>
		<link>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 5D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christian Handl has done a very interesting comparision between Nikon D3 and Canon 5D at lower ISO settings and in the studio with some interesting comments on dynamic range and the ability to boost shadows without noise: &#8220;The propagated fantastic high ISO-performance is actually very good, but for a Canon photographer less of a sensation, with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologically.net/nikon-d3/d3-d300-and-5d-studio-comparision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

